Technalysis Research
Previous Blogs

October 7, 2014
Is Windows Still Relevant?

September 30, 2014
Tablet and Smartphone Futures: Specialization

September 23, 2014
Is the App Ecosystem Sustainable?

September 16, 2014
The Wearable-Identity Connection

September 9, 2014
The Password Dilemma

September 8, 2014
Insider Extra: SanDisk--Driving Flash Forward

September 2, 2014
Smart Connected Devices: A New Forecast

August 26, 2014
Phablets—aka Pocket Computers—Drive New World Order

August 19, 2014
Device Usage Diversity

August 12, 2014
New Life for the PC

August 5, 2014
Hot Items for the Holidays: Large Phones, Notebooks and Smart TVs

July 29, 2014
Smartphones: Life's Remote Control

July 22, 2014
The Joy of Vintage Tech

July 15, 2014
Digital Generation Gap

July 8, 2014
Virtualization Reborn

July 1, 2014
Portable Digital Identities

June 24, 2014
The Future of UI: Contextual Intelligence

June 17, 2014
Moving to Markets of One

June 16, 2014
Insider Extra: Dell and the Battle for Business

June 10, 2014
Screen Overload to Drive Screen-less Devices

June 3, 2014
Apple Drives Vision of Seamless Multi-Device Computing

May 27, 2014
Surface Pro 3: The Future of PCs?

May 22, 2014
Insider Extra: SanDisk: The Many Faces of Flash

May 20, 2014
The Technological Divining Rod

May 13, 2014
Computing in the Cloud

May 6, 2014
Device Usage a Question of Degree

April 29, 2014
The Next Smartphone Battleground: Durability

April 22, 2014
BYOD: A Work in Progress

April 18, 2014
Insider Extra: AMD Back in the Groove

April 15, 2014
The Mobility Myth

April 9, 2014
BYOD Dilemma: Devices vs. Data

April 8, 2014
Insider Extra: Qualcomm's Evolving Story

April 1, 2014
A Wearables Forecast

March 25, 2014
Measuring Success in Wearables? It's Thousands of Thousands

March 24, 2014
Insider Extra: Intel Strategy Moves Forward

March 18, 2014
IOT: Islands of Isolated Things?

March 11, 2014
Wearables Cautionary Tale

March 4, 2014
The New Platform Battle

February 25, 2014
Watch What Happens

February 18, 2014
Talkin' 'bout Touchpads

February 11, 2014
The MultiOS Conundrum

February 4, 2014
Computing Redefined

January 28, 2014
The Apple Problem

January 21, 2014
The 2-in-1s People Might Want

January 14, 2014
The Post Tablet Era

January 7, 2014
The Innovation Asymptote

December 31, 2013
Top 5 2014 Predictions

December 17, 2013
Holiday Shoppers Gifting Themselves

December 10, 2013
Companion Apps

December 3, 2013
Aisle Check

TECHnalysis Research Blog

October 14, 2014
Does Big Data Equal Big Brother?

One of the hottest topics in the world of enterprise IT for the last several years has been big data. The idea behind it is relatively straightforward: in our increasingly connected world, it’s possible to collect a lot of information on everything from how people use different types of applications, to how athletes perform on the field, to what web sites we all visit and what types of things we search for and/or purchase.

All of this information is essentially just a bunch of random data bits that are increasingly being stored on the seemingly endless supply of storage housed in increasingly more powerful data centers that companies and other institutions are putting up all over the world. By itself, of course, this data is meaningless, but through the use of analytics-based software, the idea is that you can mine these big data stores for truly useful information.

In reality, many organizations are finding that it’s pretty difficult to make that leap from data to information, but there are also many companies who are doing it quite successfully. We’ve all undoubtedly seen how quickly an innocent search on say, a new suit, translates into a barrage of men’s wear ads on nearly every site you visit.

But targeted advertising isn’t where these interactions end. Instead, some companies are compiling entire profiles on individuals that pull together everything from marital status, political perspective, income, health, location and much more into a somewhat frightening, Orwellian-like dossier. In fact, a front page story in yesterday’s WSJ is about companies who are building entire businesses around this collection of data as well as how companies in other industries are trying to place a value on this information.

Depending on your age, your technology comfort level, political viewpoint and many other factors, your view on this subject may range from completely OK to completely not OK with these developments, but regardless, there’s no denying that they represent an unprecedented degree of insight into our personal lives.

In my mind, that raises the inevitable question: Is this something that needs to be looked at, considered and potentially even legislated by governmental organizations? In some parts of the world, notably European countries such as Germany, it already has. But here in the US, there’s been little “official” action on the issue.

The reasons are probably fairly obvious: Do we want government impeding with private enterprise? Given the Edward Snowden revelations, there are understandably big concerns about the US government regulating the tracking of individuals, given how much they’ve apparently already been doing.

But despite all these concerns—and to be clear, I think many of them are very legitimate—is it really fair to assume that private industry is going to be any more protective of our personal data? I would argue that both common sense and business history would suggest not. Basic Adam Smith-inspired capitalism tells us that companies’ fundamental interest is making money and they often use whatever approaches they believe are acceptable in order to achieve that end.

Do I believe all companies who are collecting big data are planning to use it for big brother-like purposes? Of course not, but do I think that turning a blind eye to all the private industry-driven personal data collection and keeping governmental organizations from playing some kind of role in this area is a mistake? Absolutely. Given all the security breaches we’ve seen from private companies, there clearly needs to be outside focus placed on these issues.

No one wants to live through true Big Brother-like scenarios, but l believe it is naïve to think those kind of scenarios could only happen through a governmental organization. Given the level of information many tech-focused big data firms already have, an unregulated private industry could prove to be an even bigger threat.

While many may find the idea of regulating private industry to be an unpalatable concept, I believe that the time has come to start an active dialogue on the subject of how our personal data is collected, stored and used.

Here's a link to the original column:

Leveraging more than 10 years of award-winning, professional radio experience, TECHnalysis Research participates in regular audio podcasts in conjunction with the team at
  Research Schedule
A list of the documents that TECHnalysis Research plans to publish in 2015 can be found here.